Text Preview
For six years, the rule has been simple: If you question an election, you are a threat to democracy. If you question it loudly, you are an insurrectionist. If you question it with a flag and a bad idea about where to park, you are a domestic terrorist.
Now, with the midterms less than a week out, people in the “democracy-protection” business are discussing, on tape, what to do when the federal government purportedly becomes illegitimate in the aftermath of the 2026 or 2028 elections.
Recordings of video meetings from January, March, April, July, August, and September of this year were obtained by the researcher who posts as DataRepublican and reported on Oct. 20 by The Post Millennial.
On multiple calls in March and August with Renew American Democracy (RAD) and Democratic Constitution Forum (DCF), Danielle Reiff of the Democracy Renewal Group said she was “foreseeing a crisis of legitimacy around the November election” and called the midterms a possible “window of opportunity.” She described a sequence: a national convening, a declaration of “red lines,” then a move toward a constitutional convention outside the existing process. In another recording, she says: “We can take that breakdown moment and leverage it for a big structural reform, you know, refounding moment.”
She expanded on the red lines to say: “So that if there is a red line crossed in terms of a Constitutional crisis, like everybody’s already pre-organized. … And so Mike Smith actually said, he goes, ‘Oh, you guys have the day-after-tomorrow plan.'”
at the original publisher
Preview excerpt — approximately 252 words shown. The full piece is at the link above.
Selected for Rip's readers. Article text and links belong to the original publisher.